Indian Pseudointellectualism

In August 2014, a particular college in Kerala withdrew an item from their students cultural program because the protagonist in the item said "namaste".  Another 150 year old school had its emblem reworked, because it had a lamp in it, which a particular community suddenly felt offensive.  A teacher was suspended for singing a Hindu prayer, though the school regularly prayed christian prayers.

This college or community is not run by the RSS nor do they belong to Hindus.  Yet why did it happen in secular kerala, yet why no fuss?  Yet again, Indian intellectuals were not heard yelping either, why this blink?

This blink is the foundation of what is called Indian Pseudointellectualism and its carriers suffer from Indian Pseudointellectual Blink Syndrome (IPBS).

I am an ardent follower of Hinduism, but I dont go to temples or pray at idols regularly, nor do I permit myself to be restrained by casteism.  Then what kind of Hindu am I?

The Vedas does not prescribe temple worship or idol worship. It says everyone should do pancha maha yagnam.  So when temples and idol worship was not there, there was no room for priests. The majority were agriculturalists who farmed to feed themselves. There was no system of trade or competition. It was a barter system, so there were no vysyas. Everyone bartered. Warfare was not much developed in those times, so the need for a large army or kshathriyas did not exist. There was no wealth accumulation or multiplying system, so there must have not been any shudras to serve the wealthy.

So, the fact that when the vast majority of Indians was largely into farming, and when there was no temple/idol worship, it is illogical to think that priests/brahmins were dominant or controlling, because priests/bramhins did not exist then.

India is still a nation whose economy is dependent on agricultural output.  So obviously, agriculture itself was the mainstay of Hindu economy.  This again validates the argument that vast majority of Hindus were into farming.

The plurality of Hinduism is equally uncomprehendable to western intellectuals and so is to western educated desi intellectuals.  Because the westerns only wanted you to copy and paste, never think.  The plurality is unthinkable.

You need to have some basic knowledge of Sanskrit to know the meaning of chathurvarnyam.  It is about categorization of the inherent taste/quality of a person.  Therefore the mention of danger of mixing of caste, would be like what the job portal Monster.Com ad in TV shows, of a man in cricket jersey doing a washermans job or a danseuse in an airport helping park a plane, or an industrial worker trying a dentists job.

If you are intellectual, what you may do is ponder how history evolved and permitted this to become caste system determined by color of skin or occupation of family. For this, Hinduism or Sanatana Dharma is not to blame.  Would you blame Hinduism for potbelly of Indians, for Indians eating with their hands, open defecation, washing the butts with hand and water rather than using tissue papers, alcoholism, vegetarianism, etc?  How did you become an intellectual without having the capacity to differentiate between a social evil and a religious evil?  You can, if you suffer from IPBS.

Again, these righteous politically correct saints would find America or the Europe as the standard for equality and liberty.

This original postcard from the early 1900's depicts a Black man tied to a whipping post in Delaware. Whipping posts were used for punishment by public humiliation and physical abuse, sometimes lethal. These punishments generally lasted for hours
	The most famous slave ship was named Jesus.  Slaves from Africa were stacked per diagram for maximum space utilization, tied and immobile for weeks.  Dead and weak ones were thrown to the sea before the ship reached the Auction harbor.

 

They would tell you how US and UK are the picture perfect paradise for blacks and Asians.  They would never agree or debate about the abominable gory history of slavery that has its scar on the lives of Negros and red Indians even today.  We are told everything is hunky dory there and that we need to learn from the Americans about how to treat everyone as equals.

We lampoon our historical figures, their writings, speeches, thinking, or actions today.  For those of whom Mahathma Gandhi is the apple in the eyes, you criticize Godse and Savarkar, without attempting to feel the gist of emotions and events that charged the people of those times, what we do is not intellectual.  It is only pseudo intellectual; literary attempts by bored people to get some attention or keep a part time job, copy and paste emotions and ideas.  A case of cheapjacks, too many, out for a party.  The mouthings are often intellectually convenient or else conveniently intellectual that display their pedantries.

For those of whom Mahathma Gandhi is the apple in the eyes, you must know that Mahathma Gandhi is being disrobed for his folly of approaching the British to favour Indians against Negros. Today, Indians are being asked to quit South Africa for his folly.  A new hate song by a Zulu a pop singer is hot debate there.

Why, now a days all attempts are being made to resurrect another Mahathma in India, by demonizing Gandhi, by the very people for whom Gandhi stood for.

Now if you are going to argue that Gandhi may be excused as he could have been carried away by the "gist of emotions and events that charged the people of those times" in Africa, then how come you deny the same excuse for Savarkar and Godse?

Those who still attempt to resurrect Mahathma Gandhis assassination as a tool against the Sangh Parivar are base men who have no passion for history, who have neither studied Mahathma Gandhi or Godse.  Nor are they doing so out of love for Gandhi, nor do they respect democracy or secularism, for the supreme court has very specifically, repeatedly, aired its views on this matter.  How many who blame Godse ever read the letter he had in his hand when he killed Gandhi?

I say base men, because they are not people who have thought about things a bit.  They have been carried away by propaganda of vested interests or are knowingly or unknowingly the foot soldiers of vested interest.  Why? Because we have not seen even a single "intellectual" ever seen raking his/head over what made the brahmin/farmer majority country to become a shudra/vysha majority country that we are today?  As to why it is simply impossible for a bunch of coward brahmins to coerce well built and physically strong dalits or shudras into submission.  To claim that they did so by brain power/manipulation is a blatant accusation that dalits are brainless.  Neither are dalits brainless, nor they the saints of peaceful living to just be coerced by a bunch of bell ringing brahmins.  How have we failed to notice this aspect of things?  ..... IPBS again.

Ghar wapsi is abominable, but Joshua Project and Thessalonica Project are adorable ...  blink blink !!

Ever counted the number of armies that invaded India over the last 1000 and more years?  Ever turned the pages of history books to check what the invading armies did to Indians?  What effects these wars had on the economy and society of ancient agrarian India?

There are no takers for research on this crucial twist, because if you do, you expose the ugly truths on which secularism of Indias today rests.  See symptoms of IPBS there?

So now we say Sati is a Hindu evil, you dont talk what actually forced mass Sati and how it became rampant.  You say Sikh warriors protected Hindu women, you dont talk what actually happened to the Hindu warriors and Hindu men.  You say Shudras were oppressed, you dont talk how the Shudras were ex-Brahmins until a few centuries ago.

Listed next are a few names who were censured by the supreme court, over the years, for making inglorious utterances - EMS Namboothripad, Paloli Muhammad Kutty, VK Singh, Biman Bose, P Shivasankar, VS Achuthananthan, K Pankajakshan, Arundati Roy, MV Jayarajan.  The common denominator is that most of them have the same political orientation.  We must have 1000s of other utterances which the Supreme Court did not bother to snap, but the poison that these loose intellectuals have injected into the minds of their foot soldiers would surely have someway damaged the fabric of our society.

Love Jihad is being publicized as the brain child of Sangh Parivar in Kerala.  The intellectuals never tell you that the christian community in kerala is also equally worried.  We are given a feeling that Love Jihad is a menace that afflicts only Indians.  The intellectuals seems to not know that it is a world wide menace because it is called sex grooming in other parts of the world and affects both Christians and Sikhs communities even in Britain.  The blink again.

Casteism is blamed on the mechanization of the evil Brahmins, fine.  So it means the rest are all equals, are they?  Kshathriyas are as Brahmins for the vysyas, the vysyas are as Brahmins for the shudras.  Shudras are the epitome of pity, sorrow, and sympathy, is it?  Have you heard of the athi-shudras?  So we know the Shudras are not saints either, for they are the Brahmins for athi-shudras.  Now, that is the oops moment for Indias caste-specialist intellectuals, ..a yet another Do-Not-Talk-About-It subject.  Another of IPBS again.

Attempts are being made by many a pseudo-intellectuals (read disillusioned ex-coomies) to picture Vedic life or Vedic religion as something too complex and extra-terrestrial.  Every Hindu home practices a diluted version of the Vedic rituals, oblivious of the original ritual.  In fact, in India, xtians and xlums, have adopted many diluted version of the Vedic life.  You have not heard of Shodasha Samskara, but you follow many of those rituals under a different name and yet you insist that Vedic life has been elusive.

How do Indian Intellectuals manage to distort Indian mythology uniformly?  How come they blink when it comes to crucial facts, ... again uniformly? ..... err IPBS.

 

We have resigned to the notion that the poverty that India is known for is the cake baked by Indians.  We now have not even a faint idea, of the many who invaded Hindustan, who plundered our riches and left.  Today, we know not who they were.  Today, we know not where those riches are.  The nations and palaces that rose from the looted riches have fallen, but Hindustan still stands.  Hindustan, you know now, holds the promise to take over.

Nationalism was in blood of every Indian during the time of the British Raj.  Because the Raj, wore the mask of a civilizing agent, became a threat to the very existence of the most tolerant civilization on the face of the earth.  Nationalism purged the Raj, after which nationalism receded.

Indian pseudo-intellectuals desperately want to be heard.  They have nothing to lose.  Rendered fatherless by winds of time, finding themselves lost and inconsequential after all the brouhaha, in despair like a postmenopausal whore cursing the world around her lamenting of the glorious past, looking towards a hopeless future.  IPs have perched high up the branches of cynicism to sneer upon their own brethren on the ground.  They read English authors whose names are tongue twisters, and quote reams of them.  For them, everything Indian is risible.  They feel righteous if they lampoon India and Indians.  They love to identify themselves with the graduates from the universities of Europe or America, American films, rock bands, black&whites.  They see India today with the same derision that Lord Macaulay viewed Indians during the raj.  Their intelligence is rated by the ability to be verbose and cynical of every thing Indian and in their ability to be linked with someone or something Western.  Cynicism is their best virtue.  They surprisingly have not heard of nihilism either.

Mouthings of typical Indian psudointellectuals in secular India

This is the price the nation, that allowed freedom of speech, has to pay today.  If such cynical, irresponsible Indians are out to destroy the very foundation of the idea of India, then someone has to step in to stop this muck.

Role of Modi in 1984 riots?  Based in New York, Indian Pseudo-intellectuals even eke out a living by planting typos.  These protesters are never seen when Sonia or Rahul Gendi visits US.  Anyone got Rajiv Gendi a visa ban?  No,  Why?

This stems from the thinking of the backward among the intellectuals who take refuge in mocking century old traditions and beliefs to showcase their intellectuality, to compensate their inability to identify and act constructively on contemporary issues for social good.

The leftists of intellectual kerala in the 50s to 70s imposed strict atheism within their fold to keep their brood close knit.  Atheism was best antidote to prevent flock from leaking towards the congress or the Janata Party.  It helped the coomies captivate the imagination of the wayward for whom the orthodoxy that reeked the social and political landscape was an anathema.  They were promised dignity as intellectuals within the atheist brood by enlisting as leftist.

Old generation indian pseudo intellectuals.

These waywards (തോന്യവാസി) had a history of throwing human defecation on devout believers on the way to temples and churches, often disrobing in public to discourage women on their way to temples, throwing glass shards all over temple grounds to disrupt temple festivals, instances of physical violence and desecration of religious sites were norm and unchallenged.  So much for their respect for democracy that are now pages of faded history in the long list of selective dementia suffered by Indian pseudo intellectuals.  Fortunately, globalization has helped new gen of these intellectuals to be computer savvy, proficient in English, have jobs in MNCs, and even have jobs in Devaswom boards that run temples of Kerala for the Government. 

If you look at world nations, even a dimwit can find that ancient India has contributed substantially to science, be it physics, maths, chemistry, or astronomy.  Those contributions were made when India was very religious.  What is paramount is the need for a society that gives liberty to its people.

It is foolish to harp that just because a person follows a particular religious ritual/belief he is unscientific.  It is more because of the senseless obsession against religions of yester years, whereas there are far more serious issues to tackle in our daily lives today ... for example pollution, of animal abuse, adulteration.

Chilly placed in the eye of cows transported to Kerala from Tamilnadu to keep it awake, so that it does not take much space on the truck if it falls asleep.

 How many of these critics use mass transport to do their bit to reduce air pollution or buy/use a car based on its mileage?  What have we done about adulteration in our daily food that is now virtually toxic?

Colour of Periyar Changed due to Industrial effluents

Dead fish in Kerala waters due to river pollution from pesticides

 

These are things we can very well control or prevent if we act.  We do these desktop criticism of things that are beyond our immediate concern to satiate our insincere concern for society, to be apologetically counted among the educated and intellectual.  I call it pseudointellectual social masturbation.  or IPBS?

Vedas, the gospel of Hindus, advocates monotheism.  It is against Idol worship.  Vedas says god has no form or a single name.  It is all pervading.  The concept of many gods came after puranas and ithihasas tried to explain lessons of Vedas through stories and made protagonists in the story as Devi and Devatas, though in principle it says, they all represent the one supreme being.  That if Vedas was of Brahmin ownership, Veda Vyasa, the compiler of the Holy Vedas was neither a brahmin or a kshathriya.  How come Indian pseudointellectuals are always universally ignorant of this fact when they ridicule the "many gods" of India?  ... IPBS at work?

Human thinking is said to be controlled by three types of attitudes

(1) Manushya guna.

(2) Rakshasa guna.

(3) Deva guna.

So if you take a person in total as 100, then he would have 100/3=33.333333*  facets.

Now in vernacular language, the corner is called kodi (കോടി ).  When you get facial paralysis and jaw goes to the side, it is said mukham kodi.  The house have its corners as kodi, the nation has its corner again dhanushkodi.

It is this again that comes as the corner/side of 33, the decimals that goes to infinity.  This 33 and kodi got corrupted or misunderstood as 33 crore gods.

Yet, we have all seen 1000s of posts by "Indian intellectuals" making a caricature of Indian Gods with elephant head, demon king with 10 heads, God and his 16,000 wives, and a lot more.  Another example of the mysterious and universal IPBS.

Every one looks towards the future, and so do those with IPBS.  Now they have their universal inability to see history in the right perspective, inability to contribute to contemporary social issues, inability to hold promise for the future due to their growing irrelevance and loss of platforms that granted political patronage.  Pseudointellectuals have thrived the last couple of decades at the cost of mainstream society that has chugged across many centuries.  Pseudointellectuals have nothing to call theirs and so nothing to lose.

Intellectual babus in the 50s used to be the nightmare of big and small businesses as they could find loopholes in the company laws and stir strikes and shut downs, these businesses buckled and locked out one by one, public sector companies ran to huge losses and so the babus moved on to bleed the private sector.  Pseudointellectuals have brought down anything that stood tall, they have never built up anything.  The knack of fault finding, cynicism while being on the right side of political correctness is what keeps IPs busy.  Political cowards who love to watch the show from the gallery of political correctness would lap up any stunt upon the trapeze.  Their loud applause, in the tent, is their social activity and the rapturous crowd the recognition of their political stance.

The chips are down nationally for the pseudointellectuals and so the babus have been replaced by lonewolves, who operate from their homes with laptops and ipads.  They are on the lookout for newer topics to lampoon.  The more they lampoon, the more righteous they think they are and/or have become.  It does not matter if they are making a mountain out of trivia or how base the stand is.  It is just a mundane chore.

Today, there are no industrial behemoths to close down anymore.  Smart corporates and career focused youth are far astute than the babus.  Dreams of revolutions have collapsed, political fortunes and patronage have dwindled.  Worse, the hitherto fringe right wing have over run the nation, have begun to answer back, earned dumbfounding acceptance democratically.

Lonewolves would do their job on the sly, who could get the job done and would leave enough room for pseudointellectuals to wriggle out and never be unmasked.  A strategy used by the worlds top terror outfit ISIS.

Mehdi Masroor Biswas, was for bangloreans a harmless, law abiding chum all along until a British tabloid exposed him.

Intelligence officials say..."It's a new trend of educated youth that is not fully committed to go out and fight but yet wants to do something that it thinks is a just cause. It may not be a direct threat but has the dangerous potential to radicalise new generation in hordes," said a senior officer in a security agency. Bengaluru police commissioner M N Reddi said: "After the interrogation for the past few hours, as of now, we don't see his involvement in any kind of terrorist activities within the country…As of now, he has never recruited anybody nor did he facilitate any such activity within India. He has never traveled outside India. He has been only in the virtual world."

Indian Pseudointellectuals have employed it with much finesse far early that even the ISIS in India, the latest being another cheapjack gimmick called the "Kiss of Love" knowing very well that sex sells 24x365 and that there cannot a better platform to rope in "new generation in hoards."  The top rung of most intellectualist organizations belong to the worn-out Sholay era oldies who have been hooked to their inhalers and insulin pumps for sometime now.  So lone wovles know there is soon a huge vacuum to fill and their one night of fame is within reach.  The trick lies in being an early bird, being media sweet, and to be on the right side of political correctness at that specific point in time

Great ancient nations Greece, Egypt, Rome have collapsed after it abandoned its rich cultural history.  Britain and America are facing a financial meltdown with the Britishers not having enough oomph to even fund the quees palace and American debt stands at $19 trillion.  China and Japan have fought all odd and moved ahead because they never detached themselves from their history and culture.  India has not collapsed because she held on to her traditions inspite of the good efforts by pseudointellectuals who plumbed the depths of depravity to portray India in poor light across every opportunity time had offered.

So not surprisingly, cultural nationalism is fast infecting the blood of every Indian, because secularists, wearing the mask of religious equality, and pseudo-intellectualism is threatening the very existence of the most tolerant and peaceful religion and nation on the face of the earth.

Modi Veni, Vidi, Vici

Modi Veni Vidi Vici....

He won Dammit !!  .. and he won big time !!

He won inspite of being heavily branded as the most communal man on earth.  Yet he swept off India in one sweep in a Veni Vidi Vici moment, a milestone and turning point in the history of  Indian democracy.  Modi won the land that is the Mother of all religions, the cauldron of faith gave him a thumping victory.

How the hell !!

Yes, we now have to wake up and accept this unbelievable reality.  Unbelievable not just the wide electoral acceptance of NaMo, but also the electoral rejection of the secularists.

Everyone who voted for NaMo knows very well what a staunch Hindu hardliner he is, what his history says about his association with the RSS.  Yet he won.  He won in the most publicized and hotly contested and scrutinized election in the history of democracy.  He won at a time when voters have been at the peak of awareness and being informed.  He won in an election that had record lowest to none violence or other electoral malpractices.

There has never been an election with these many TV channels that had 100s of fierce discussions about NaMo in the days that lead up to election of May 2014 and where 1000s of anti-Modi campaigners made themselves very well heard, spewing the most venomous of accusations against Narendra Modi, no stones were left unturned to ensure that NaMo is defeated. So not a single vote would have gone for NaMo even by mistake, yet he won.

He won by too many seats that the Cong (I) does not have enough numbers to even qualify to lead the opposition in Indian Parliament, in an election that NaMo lead on a wave showcasing his performance in his home state of Gujrat.

The rout is not just of the grand old Congress party, but rout also of the Communists and the Dravidian proponent, DMK, have been total - decimated.

So what is with it this time?  ..it is just that Indians have informed the world in style and called the bluff off India's irrelevant ideologies of the Congress, Communists, and the Dravidians .....  a declaration that Indians have decided to change.

It has become so disappointing to the secularists that even Muslims have turned up in large numbers to vote for NaMo inspite of the relentless demonization of NaMo.

Muslims who have openly come out to the streets ignoring the shrill of secularist rants is also another hint that Indians have decided to change.  Muslims no longer like the notion of being herded like goats.  They find sense in being in sync with the times, preferring to downplay calls to think communally.  Thanks to NaMo, Muslims understand the fruits of development, which they dont want to miss out. ...  Indians have learned to move forward and think beyond religion or religious issues.

Muslims now realize that it is not always necessary that only a Muslim-appeasing leader can take care of Muslim interests.

They no longer love or hate a party based on how it appear through the prism of their religion.  So the calls of venomous mullahs no longer spook Muslims like before.

Indians have shown that they now understand that the rise of Hindu Nationalists does not mean the death of secularism, because after all the pseudo-secular, hinduphobic attacks on Hinduism and/or Hindus they have heard the hitherto unheard counter points, and it has dawned upon them that only a good Hindu can be truely secular.

This is why, no matter what, there was not even a single riot in Gujrat after 2002, not a single curfew for more than a decade in a state where almost 200 curfews a year was norm.  Isnt that what India needs after all?

Given that more number of communal violence has happened under Congress govts, they could not get their act together and prevent riots or avoid curfews the way NaMo could in Gujrat.

We know Pakistan scares out almost 5000 hindus to India every year, hindu girls are kidnapped and forcefully married after conversion to Islam, the same of which happens in Bangladesh too.  How many Christians in India have been lynched under blasphemy laws and the govt turned a blind eye to it?  How many Hindus and Christians have reached the top echelons of society in Pakistan and Bangladesh even though Christians and Muslims existed in Pakistan and Bangladesh before partition?  If the story is different in India, then it is only because India is an unofficial Hindu Rashtra and there is this growing realization that lampooning Hinduism or Hindus for aberration in secularism is grossly wrong.

Almost 4000 Sikhs were killed during the 1982 riots, but we know these riots have never reached our breakfast table with as much heat as Gujrat in 2002 which snuck out lives of 1300 Muslims.  Why?  Because our secular hinduphobic publications wanted it that way and it should not be surprising that Barkha Dutt, the media queen of secularism, of Radia tapes fame, went about informing the rioters through TV as to where all there is no police presence.  But what made the difference in 2014 was that social media was far free and unbiased and touched the lives of every new voter who went to election booths to get their fingers blue inked.  Our mainstream electronic and print media now stands isolated and exposed for being meek slaves of phoren shahibs or phoren ideologies.

But will these hinduphobic secular trolls accept NaMo if he gives India a communal riot free India after 5 years?  No.  Modi's India, without a communal riot every day, is unthinkable for the sickulars.  Modi's India, that does not spawn audacious reports of gory violence against muslims, is unthinkable for the sickulars.  Modi's India, where muslims live in peace, is unthinkable for the sickulars.  It would take the wind out of the sails of the sickulars, prove them wrong and irrelevant for decades to come.  But the danger lies there, because to portray NaMo as communal, one has to trigger communal riots and defame him, but NaMo happens to be a man of acumen who knows this mischief has been at play for decades in India under the sickulars, knows very well the lessons from Godhra, and is prepared.

The most vociferous secularists raised the bogey of Hindu terror to neutralize the brazen acts of Islamic terror, to become appealing before Muslim vote brokers.. It gave desi jihadis a reason to even challenge Indian Army in Kashmir, jihadis who were trained within India, in a state none other than which is often touted as the paradise of secularism - Kerala.  Coincidentally, this is the same state which is used as the safest hideout by the Maoist naxalites.

How come the paradise of Indian secularism is also the transit point for counterfeit Indian currency printed in Pakistan and smuggled in from Dubai?  In fact, there is an international airport in India's secular paradise known to have been built, for and, by the power and influence of the smuggling community and their sycophants in state cabinet.

Narendra Modi with Murli Manohar Joshi at Srinagar in 1992

Secularists in India have their peculiar ways because, for example, their arguments against Article 370 and uniform civil code.  How does Article 370 and uniform civil become a communal issue?  Article 370, very clearly says it is a temporary provision.  How did Article 370 get related to Muslims?  Where were these secularists in 1992 when you could not hoist the Indian National Flag in Srinagar without risking your life?

Isnt the uniform civil code obviously common sensical?  Because if all people are to be treated equally, does not it make sense to have a uniform law?  How can it be secular if we have different laws for different religions?  Will Muslims agree to be hanged for theft or adultery in India then? Are such allowances allowed for minorities in secular USA, UK, or Italy?

Again, secularists talk only to favor the Muslims and Christians.  Why are there no mongers for minorities of Indian origin, the Sikhs, Jains, Parsis, and Buddhists?  Minorities are safe even if you massacre the Sikhs or if you tear down Buddhist or Jain temples in India.

To be prove your secular credential, a good hindu must often abuse hindu beliefs and practices, eat beef, relish ramzan poridge and snacks at the nearest iftar party, visit church with christians friends on christmas, display your christian rosary.  How many so called secular Xtian/Xlum would eat prasad from a Hindu temple or visit Sabarimala to assert their secular credentials and join the Indian secular jingoism?  Uhh, now, after all, we know, that to be liberal, we have to ignore those facts that could hurt our position, right?  ... and to be counted among the upscale literati, you have to be one among these liberals aint it?

We have had enough of it.  Things are changing, because we have reached the tipping point.

Let us look at how attitudes have changed.  Let us start from a very secular and apolitical subject - cricket.

Those who are fans of this game know how phoren commentators (read as white shabibs) used to degrade indians and pakistanis even for smallest of reasons.  For us then, that was the way we were to be talked about.  Things changed when BCCI became fat rich.  Now Indian commentators call the shots and we know how things got to the point where Ganguly and Sreeshants went to thresh the mighty Aussies in their own den.  Do we now hear phoren shahibs making any innuendos?  No, not any longer.

Same goes with the secularists (now a days called the sickularists) bandwagon.  Secularism in Indian context is funded and promoted by the west.  Indian intellectuals and secularists were picked and promoted by the west.  Picked by the west?  Yes, firstly because the secularism that we know today is of western import, where Sikh turbans, Hindu Bindi, and Muslim burqas are abhorred by their version of religious equality and freedom, their version of secularism, who until a few decades ago did not think black negros were humans.  Secondly, because, for long, if there was a subject on India or Indians to be discussed in the Western media or West-funded media, only those desi "intellectuals" who toed the shahibs line were counted, and what came in phoren media was gospel truth to Indians.  These desi shabibs were adored because they were quoted in the phoren shabibs media.  This spawned a generation of journalists, thinkers, and intellectuals who won their bread by their competence in denigrating anything desi.  Here, when we say "intellectuals," we have now resigned to accept that "intellectuals" means leftists or that only leftists have exclusive rights to be "intellectuals".  They floated NGOs, cultural organizations, writers groups, and roped in many failed lawyers and artists to present an aura of legitimacy and be tagged progressive, who ensured that what went through their sphere of influence was sanitized, shaded secular, and enforce that secularism was all about tokenism.  This secularism and democracy became their baap ka maal.  Not any more.

What is the difference now?  The rise of Desi electronic media and a more stronger Desi social media that disseminates Desi thoughts like riots in real time.  Indians have started to read, hear, and see the Desi version of things without the phoren or desi shahibs prop.

This Desi wave has swept away the archaic Indian intellectuals who monopolized Indian media until now, which was largely atheist (read leftist) or western educated and obviously anti-Hindu (read secular).  Moreover, there is going to be a new wave of media take overs that would dampen the grip of sickularists over Indian media and therefore their grip on India.  God forbid, Indian tycoons shall set their eyes on international players too and there will be a paradigm shift in the way world sees the world too.

There are many columnists who would want to cite Gujrat as the most communal state, compared to other states as having a communal/casteist hue of far lesser degree and of Kerala being the paradise of secularism.  That being the case, we need to explore the kind of secularism and democracy being practised in this Gods Own Country.

Rs.1000 crore per year is the average revenue Kerala Govt earns from Devaswom Boards that control Hindu temples over the last 5 decades.  Now the assets of Sri Padmanabha Temple in Thiruananthapuram is up for grabs after the recent discovery.  Will, in our secular paradise, the government or court have the gall to audit the church or mosque accounts, forget seizing them?  Kerala's mosques and churches have existed even before independence, many of which had endowments received from the royal courts.  No church or mosque in pre-independent India has been built on foreign funds, yet only Hindu temples are deemed fit to be called public property.  Indian secularism hinges on the persecution of Hindus.

Financial sources for Hindus are strangulated by taking over Hindu places of worship, and denying these fund to Hindus to start economic or educational enterprises for Hindus, denial of loans and subsides to Hindus thereby forcing Hindus to depend on Xtian/Xlum institutions for employment and education.

 Kerala is said to be an almost 50 to 55% Hindu state with a 20 to 25% population of Christian and Muslims.  Here vote bank politics is so brazen that communist party goes all the way to pamper one Mr. Madhani who is accused of terror related crimes and been in jails in Tamilnadu and Karnataka, who himself lost his leg while fiddling with a country bomb in his home.

CPM leaders felicitating terror accused Mr. Madhani after his release from Tamilnadu Jail.

Madhani is currently lodged in a Karnataka jail for serial bomb blasts in Karnataka in 2008.  Another terror accused, was an accomplice and close aide of Soofiya Madhani, the wife of Mr. Madhani, currently jailed for their role in the bus burning case in Kalamassery.  CPM in fact went on to have a tie up with PDP during one of the assembly elections.  Also of note, comrade EMS Nambothiripad is the Quaid-e-Azam of Malabar for carving out a muslim homeland inside Kerala.  Leftist led NGOs openly campaign to get Mr. Madhani let off the hook by calling his case a human rights abuse.  Yet, the CPM in Kerala uses every opportunity to raise the 2002 riots bogey to brand BJP as communal.  They seem to blink when it comes to a cancer patient Sadhvi Pragya though.  This CPM claims to be the epitome of secularism in Kerala. 

File picture of Prof TJ Thomas recuperating at home after his hand was chopped, shown being attended to by his wife who later committed suicide

It did not come as a surprise that under the CPM rule, in July 2010, a Christian professor from Thodupuzha, Mr. TJ Thomas, got his hand chopped by attackers who imposed the rulings of a taliban-model court following a purportedly blasphemous question in the paper set by him for a college exam.

Malayalis are so used to the communist ways of arm twisting democracy that in the last 4 decades, of the 600 odd political killings, hardly any communist has ever been convicted.  In May of 2012, the 51-year-old TP Chandrasekharan (known as TPC) was murdered in broad daylight by killer gangs of the communist party.  When one may write off this death as just another political murder, the extent and detail of planning and the surgical precision that went into making this killing would raise your eyebrow.

• Meeting held in party office to discuss and get convinced of his treachery.
• Decision made to make TPC pay the price, for the treachery, with his life.
• One (of the many) party killer gang designated to kill.  Every gang has a signature killing style and specialization.
• Logistics gang to provide transportation for killer gang designated.
• Another logistics gang to arrange multiple escape routes after killing designated.
• Another "list of criminals" to surrender listed and designated, should plans go awry and leave any proof that could point fingers towards party involvement.
• Multiple hideouts detailed.
• Arrangements for food, medical help, communications during hiding designated.
• Lawyers readied from a list of party designated group of party-loyalist lawyers.
• Influence exerted on policemen to dilute any FIRs.
• Group arranged to eliminate any witness.

The modus operandi is that when an investigation takes place against the arrested "murder suspects" the circumstantial evidence will never support the crime as the "arrested suspects" were obviously nowhere near the scene.  They are then let off.  A reinvestigation is thwarted by citing vendetta politics or by strangulating it with red tapism.

Facial Tattooing - CPM style

In the paradise of democracy - kerala - the signature style of this particular killer gang was to chop the face of the victim as many times as his age.  So TPC's face was chopped 51 times.  Another killer gangs signature style is to disembowel the victim and fill his abdomen cavity with mud and close it.  Howdy !!

Democracy in kerala permitted these murderers to update their facebook profiles using latest android phones from their jail cells.

CCTV visuals of jailbirds using mobile phone is now in public domain.  Visuals show them to be smoking, boozing, having casual clothes in plenty.  Indian jails were never seen to be this luxurious and accommodating.

Now this murder and the planning that went into making this killing with surgical precision is not a one off incident.  This has been the standard protocol of the communists over the last 5 decades that has snuck out lives of 100s of political opponents in "progressive" kerala.

One would be surprised how jailbirds got access to such facilities in jail.  Democracy in Kerala was at display when the home minister decided to make a surprise inspection of Kannur Central Jail.

The jail appeared more like a party office, replete with slogans and pictures of party leaders and icons.

Now, these are all peanuts for comrades from West Bengal who have their own way to run democracy and secularism far successfully and with far less complications using the "Bengal model" to do away with political opponents.  So we just dont hear much from that part of the world.  This CPM, we know, have been the most loud mouthed among the Modi baiters, who cried so foul about the misuse of official machinery in Gujrat.  How sweet !!

Every ordinary malayali could tell you umpteen stories of how menacing and heartless a hartal supporter can be.  This almost 100% literate democratic state has the highest number of hartals.  Trade union terror unleashed by the communist goons are the order of the day.  Yet, this CPM claims to be the epitome of democratic, progressive Kerala too.

An interesting fact about CPM is that Sitaram Yechury once had to go begging before Shri Atal Behari Vajpayee to help CPM retain its national party status is the best indicator of what mandate and acceptance this party had way back then.  In 2014, it still does not have the required number of Lok Sabha seats to qualify as a national party.

 

In spite of all this, do we see an iota of guilt or shame on the faces of our comrades?  No.

More, Kerala is today the paradise of illegal immigrants from Bangladesh.  Kerala is now sitting on top of a crime time bomb, diseases long eradicated have resurfaced, drugs in high supply, yet there is silence because sickularism is at play.

Below is the list of deaths, the year, and the name of the ruling party and the respective chief minister.

That is some 3609 deaths under congress governments.  This figure excludes the 1984 killings of Sikhs which snuffed out lives of close to 4000 sikhs.

Yet, why only Narendra Modi is hounded?  Why do the most intellectual of our secularists collectively persistently blink at these figures?

There is a reason to it.  Though India has had a long history of communal riots and a brutal era of emergency under Iron Lady of India Ms. Indira Gandhi, the ugly head of hinduphobia and fear-feeding rose only after the vacuum left by the sudden assassination of Indira Gandhi.

After the death of Indira Gandhi, India witnessed its reins being taken over by the most clumsiest, incompetent, and indecisive leaders of our times.  Starting from Rajiv Gandhi, then VP Singh, Chandrashekhar, Narasimha Rao, HD Deva Gowda, IK Gujral, and of course clumsiest of all Manmohan Singh.  They became our prime minsters by accident.  The series of coalition governments that propped these puppets of fate forced these cripples to find an alibi to hold on to power.  These accidental leaders, who sprung up mostly from regional parties knew that the only hope for them to walk through the corridors of power in Delhi are through coalition governments - an "i scratch your back, you scratch mine" setup.

So from 1984 to 2014, a full 30 years, a whole generation is witness to these back scratchers.  Not surprisingly, this is too long a period for us to naturally get carried away and accept that desi governments are to be run they way these accidental leaders ran it.

The coalition mongers unfortunately could not find anything better than rely on hinduphobia and fear-feeding to keep the sickular forces cobbled together.  They kept the nation on tenterhooks by fanning a perceived threat from "communal forces" and justify the coalition even if it meant compromising on every possible matters of national interest.

The communal riots that tore the nation under these accidental secular leaders killed far many Indians than in Gujrat 2002 - but only Gujrat was to be communal and scary.

Coalition governments are big business, because every party gets ministerial berths to loot and let their shenanigans run amok. Coalition governments were cobbled by these incompetent vermins to prevent exactly what the 2014 elections delivered - a total rout, total joblessness.

No intellectual ever bothered to check out the percentage of the votes won by these coalition pieces and question their moral right to be in power.  Unemployment that stares at the face of our intellectuals from loss of patronage or access to their share of loot has forced them to find alibis to denigrate Modi by taking time out to punch on calculators to check on the vote share of BJP in 2014.

The NDA’s own strength in Lok Sabha is 336.   Jayalalithaa and Patnaik’s parties account for 57 MPs (37 of AIADMK and 20 of BJD) in Lok Sabha and 14 in Rajya Sabha (10 of AIADMK and 4 of BJD).   Apart from that TRS has 11 who would not mind hobnobbing with the NDA to maximize the benefits for its new baby, Telangana.  Now that is some 384 seats that would swing in favor of NDA in case of a vote in parliament over any bill, leaving no scope for horse trading.  Yet how do our intellectuals find it plausible to waste time calculating the vote share of BJP to find fault with it when figures from elections in the past have been pretty abysmal for the secular parties, which lead to open horsetrading to keep the governments in power?  Does not this reflect the poor standards of our intellectuals?  How many of these elements have invested their time and effort to wonder why CPM lost its mandate that it does not qualify to be a national party now?

Couldn't it also be true that Modi made a mistake of limiting himself to Gujrat all these years, because had the motor-mouths of the sickularists been true, then the first attempt by Modi to enter the national stage should have been a disaster and his Waterloo, rather than this spectacular mandate by the people of India.  Let there be no doubt that 2014 mandate is an endorsement of Mr. Narendra Modi by the people of India, that there was definitely a Modi wave and that was the only factor that was the game changer.  It was an all-against-one war, yet he won.  The odds of 2014 against Modi was a pant-wetting prospect that no leader from any party would dare to contemplate.  The leadership, courage, planning, and confidence of Narendra Modi lies there.  His sweet victory is its proof.

NaMo fueled the Modi wave not on communalism, but with his proven trump card of development.  The world stood back and watched in awe.

Modi is the man who motivated India's educated youth to take politics seriously and sincerely.  Their massive turnout is the mandate for his call.  The world will now change for the cowards, the book worms, who took cover under leftist ideologies to cheaply get wider acceptance and be head counted among bolshevized idiots, the judges of political correctness in India, until now.

No candidate, in the history of democracy, other than Narendra Modi has ever had these many adversaries to fight against, these many odds stacked against him.  He won big time.  He won, because Indians now badly realize the need to have a leader, a leader worth his salt.  Indians have had enough with sickularism.

A dead Rahul could help Congress the way LTTE helped by getting Rajiv bumped off.  But boy, this Rahul is too clumsy that even the most bored terrorist would not want to bring ill-repute upon himself by attempting to bump Rahul.  Vadra has ensured that Priyanka will never have a political future.  So the sickularists now hope for the best that there would be imminent communal riots that would spin out of control, or an armed scuffle with Pakistan would soon ensue, or by some twist of fate that the bogey of democracy getting jeopardized can be raised and give the sickularists an excuse to impose Presidents rule, or maybe thanks to their lucky stars Narendra Modi gets assassinated, and hope against hope that somehow coalition governments are back in vogue and restores their daily bread and butter.

Untold Stories of Great Communist Visionaries

Karl Heinrich Marx

 
Karl Heinrich Marx was born on May 5, 1818, in Trier, Germany. A philosopher, economist, sociologist, historian, journalist, and revolutionary socialist, Marx's work in economics laid the foundation for how we understand labour and its relation to capital. Most of the subsequent economic thought is based on his works.

At the height of his fame, he was known as a demon by many and as a hero by others. He was the man who laid the foundation for a political system that existed for most of the 20th century and which affected millions. It is a different matter that the system was noted for its remarkable failures, yet it continues to have plenty of followers.

On his birth anniversary today, here are five interesting facts about Karl Marx that you did not know.

1. He once famously said, "All I know is I'm not a Marxist."

He is reported to have said this at a conference for Marxists which he had gone to attend. However, incensed by how they had twisted his works, he had said that if these are Marxists, then he's not one.

2. As a student, Marx was a social butterfly and his father had to bail him out when he was in university because he had racked up an enormous debt.

3. A self-proclaimed champion of the working class, he never once in his life did a labour job. Karl Marx: An exclusive interview with his biographer

A holder of various degrees, no university allowed him to teach as he proclaimed himself to be an atheist. His writings in a radical newspaper got him expelled from Germany. He married Jenny, a baroness, who loved him and was devoted to him. They moved to Paris, from where he was expelled again due to his writing. On their return home to Germany, they were expelled again after he insulted the church and the government.

The couple moved to London, where they stayed for 30 years. They had six children. Marx also had a child from a mistress. The Marx family lived in dire and abject poverty. He tried to find gainful regular employment only once - as a clerk in a railway office - but was turned down because of his illegible handwriting. Living in abject poverty and deep in debt, three of his children died of malnutrition or lack of proper care.

Their condition was said to be so dismal that he couldn't afford to buy a coffin for one of his children. Soon, Jenny also died and Marx was left with only two children. Later, he looked back at his life with regret and said, "You know that I have sacrificed my whole fortune to the revolutionary struggle. I do not regret it. Quite the contrary if I had to start my life over again, I would do the same. But I would not marry."

4. He lived a painful life.

Despite his good humour, Karl Marx did not keep very well. He had liver problems, rheumatism, sciatica and had frequent headaches, toothaches, insomnia, hemorrhoids. He also suffered from a disease that made him break out frequently in carbuncles, or boils. Sometimes these boils would cover his whole body or would be limited to his leg or genitals causing him great pain until they went away. During these episodes, he couldn't write anything and simply had to wait for them to heal before he could carry on with his projects. Perhaps it was this that led him to say, "The only antidote to mental suffering is physical pain."


5. Marx had suffered a nervous breakdown at the age of 19. Perhaps he never recovered his mental composure after that.

Perhaps that is what led author Saul K. Padover to say this about Marx in his book Karl Marx: An Intimate Biography:

"In private life he is a highly disorderly, cynical person, a poor host; he leads a gypsy existence. Washing, grooming, and changing underwear are rarities with him; he gets drunk readily. Often he loafs all day long, but if he has work to do, he works day and night tirelessly. He does not have a fixed time for sleeping and staying up; very often he stays up all night, and at noon he lies down on the sofa fully dressed and sleeps until evening, unconcerned about the comings and goings around him..."

Marx was a hypocrite. While he wrote with such sympathy for the men who worked in factories, calling them slaves, though the money he lived on and the charity he received from was of his friend Friedrich Engels, came from the Engels family interest in a factory. So the ’slaves’ were supporting the Marx family, while Marx sat and thought.

He watched his children go hungry, seeing them live in filth. Why did he allow this neglect, which tantamount to abuse, if he was not capable of giving his children a good upbringing. What was the need for having 8 children. He had an education and could have earned an income, and he knew where he had come from, a comfortable life with his parents. He could have provided for his family as his father had provided for him, but obviously that was not important to him.

Karl Marx was not well known in his lifetime. It was only a small circle of fellow Communists who knew who he was by his writings.

Marx was an intellectual academic who had a poor understanding of human nature.  He believed in perfect government, and that under direct governmental control the forces of economy could be carefully controlled for the public benefit.  What he failed to take into account was the fact that human beings are imperfect to begin with; therefore anything they build will likewise be imperfect.

The ultimate problem that Marx had was that he overlooked the human desires for money and power. Pure Communism stated that once all the laborers and craftsworkers were trading equally, the state (government) would wither and die from lack of necessity. What he overlooked was that government enforcement of the rule of law is always necessary because it is human nature to either avoid or break laws. Only money can successfully motivate people, while those who seek power will do anything to get it, and will kill to keep it!

Marx was worse than unrealistic, he was a romantic fool!

Marx based much of his philosophy on the teachings of Christianity, primarily the book of Acts "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need."

In Capitalism we can say "To each according to his productivity, From each according to his ambition"

Che Guevara

The real Guevara was a reckless bourgeois adrenaline-junkie seeking a place in history as a liberator of the oppressed. But this fanatic’s vehicle of “liberation” was Stalinism, named for Soviet dictator Josef Stalin, murderer of well over 20 million of his own people. As one of Castro’s top lieutenants, Che helped steer Cuba’s revolutionary regime in a radically repressive direction. Soon after overthrowing Batista, Guevara choreographed the executions of hundreds of Batista officials without any fair trials. He thought nothing of summarily executing even fellow guerrillas suspected of disloyalty and shot one himself with no due process.

Che was a purist political fanatic who saw everything in stark black and white. Therefore he vociferously opposed freedoms of religion, speech, press, assembly, protest, or any other rights not completely consistent with his North Korean-style communism. How many rock music-loving teens sporting Guevara t-shirts today know their hero supported Cuba’s 1960s’ repression of the genre? How many homosexual fans know he had gays jailed?

Did the Obama volunteers in that Texas campaign headquarters with Che’s poster on the wall know that Guevara fervently opposed any free elections? How “progressive” is that?

How socially just was it that Che was enraged when the Russians blinked during the 1962 Cuban missile crisis and withdrew their nuclear missiles from the island, thus averting a nuclear war? Guevara was such a zealous ideologue that he relished the specter of millions of Cuban lives sacrificed on the altar of communism, declaring Cuba “a people ready to sacrifice itself to nuclear arms, that its ashes might serve as a basis for new societies.” Some humanitarian.

Che was a narcissist who boasted that “I have no house, wife, children, parents, or brothers; my friends are friends as long as they think like me, politically.” This is a role model for today’s “post-political” voters claiming we should get beyond partisanship?

Adding to the ridiculousness of the Che cult is that he was virtually a complete failure. As a medical doctor, he never even had a practice. When put in charge of the Cuban economy at the start of Castro’s government, his uncompromising communist diktats ran it completely into the ground, from which it never recovered. Humiliated, and also angry that Castro wasn’t fomenting enough revolution abroad, he then tried to lead such quixotic adventures in Argentina, the Congo, and Bolivia, failing miserably everywhere while sacrificing the lives of scores of naïve, idealistic young followers as deluded pawns in the service of his personality cult.

Another reason he fled Cuba in the mid-1960s was the complete mess he made of his private life. Though he preached sexual purity to his colleagues, he was a shameless adulterer who abandoned two wives and many children, some legitimate, others not. As a grandson put it, “he was never home.” The public Che who supposedly had such great love for humanity privately couldn’t stand most folks.

Guevara’s promiscuous communist adventurism was the pattern of a terminal adolescent running away from his problems to get caught up in some heroic crusade against his eternal bete noir, “Yankee imperialism.”

“The blacks, those magnificent examples of the African race who have maintained their racial purity thanks to their lack of an affinity with bathing, have seen their territory invaded by a new kind of slave: the Portuguese.”

“The black is indolent and a dreamer; spending his meager wage on frivolity or drink; the European has a tradition of work and saving, which has pursued him as far as this corner of America and drives him to advance himself, even independently of his own individual aspirations.”

 Che’s views on racism smack of similar political opportunism. When it was useful to abandon his previous racial views to fight in the Cuban revolution, he readily did so. When it was convenient to use racial stereotypes to cover-up the deficiencies of his fellow Cubans he didn't hesitate.

In fact, an increasing number of modern leftists and anarchists are waking up to the fact that Che was not a 'revolutionary hero', but just one of a long line of communist murderers of the 20th century.

 Che should be remembered for the political terror he was involved in and publicly defended on a number of occasions. This was a man who was a defender of the North Korean regime and who deeply mourned the death of Joseph Stalin. 

Even sympathetic biographers, such as John Anderson, concede that Che oversaw many executions at Cuba’s notorious La Cabaña prison following the 1959 revolution. Though the exact number of killed is unclear, thousands were killed in Cuba’s post-revolutionary purge and forced labor camps. There is even some evidence that Guevara personally carried out some of the murders associated with the revolutionary period.

Che Guevara is dead....

And, as the Huffington Post points out, Guevara hoped the Soviets would launch nuclear attacks on American cities, for some reason confident that the communists would win a nuclear war that would have killed millions.

Che's severed hands being fingerprinted after execution

Perhaps the best reason for condemnation of Guevara then isn’t the racist statements buried away in his diaries but in fact the very visible blood on his hands.

 "Crazy with fury I will stain my rifle red while slaughtering any enemy that falls in my hands! My nostrils dilate while savoring the acrid odor of gunpowder and blood. With the deaths of my enemies I prepare my being for the sacred fight and join the triumphant proletariat with a bestial howl!"

"Hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine. This is what our soldiers must become … "

..a scared and shaken Che after being captured by Bolivian army

The coward begged for his life glamorously saying... "I am much more valuable to you alive than dead," he told his captors pleading for his life. Unfortunately for him, the Bolivian army gave him some of his own medicine

Cuban-American CIA agents Julio G. García (left) and Gustavo Villoldo who helped capture Guevara

...and did you know of millionaire Fidel Castro? click here

Pol Pot

The leader extreme-left Khmer Rouge Pol Pot has won the power in Cambodia in 1975. In the course of the class revolution and for accelerated transition to a fully classless society and “total equality” uncontrolled Pol Pot issued a decree on the abolition of money and blew up the national bank, so in one moment destroyed the entire economy of Cambodia. Cities as nurseries of evil, and the ancient culture were destroyed also. Political dissent and opposition were not permitted. Priests, doctors, scientists, teachers and all educated people were murdered. He entered an order that all residents must leave the city and move to the province to engage in agricultural activities. The "equal among equals"*, using the UNLIMITED POWER, deceit and the violence, it forced other "equals" to the slave labour for two bowls of rice soup per day and to dig their graves themselves. The combined effects of backbreaking toil, malnutrition, poor medical care, and perverted executions resulted in the deaths, according to different sources, from 20 to 40% of the Cambodian population.

 EMS Namboothiripad

The first communist govt under the Brahmin, EMS Namboothiripad, came to power in 1957 promising to solve rice scarcity, providing clothes for poor, and controlling price rise by opening fair price outlets across the state.
EMS signed contract with a leading rice dealer in Madras named D Ramalu P Suryanarayana without going for a tender or seeking a lowest quotation leading to hue and cry then over allegations of corruption and breach of ethics.  The rice dealer in Madras was an ex-communist and the terms and conditions of the contract was drafted to give undue advantage to the dealer.

An enquiry commission that investigated the matter found glaring irregularities in the contract and cited that it cost the excheuquer a fortune.

The price was fixed at a far higher rate than the running market rates. The corruption money raised therein was diverted to the Andhra unit of the communist party, to fund election expenses of the party.

The moot point is that, the worlds first communist regime came to power by exploiting the blessings of democracy and went on to exploit people who were reeling under severe scarcity and hunger.

To consolidate its position in the secular state of Kerala, it sought to drive its roots deeper into the society and hold it in its vice-like grip by hammering a communal wedge between communities by carving out, Malapuram, an exclusive district for Muslims, to become the apple in the eyes of muslim community and get their votes.  He was the only chief minister of India who who refused to donate even a single penny to construct the Swami Vivekananda Memorial in Kanyakumari.

Mao Zedong

At the peak of the Cultural Revolution, everyone had to carry a copy of Mao Zedong’s little red book. It was a powerful brainwashing tool, and its omnipresence ensured that only ideas consistent with Mao's quotes were considered acceptable. Formally known as “Quotations from Chairman Mao”, the red book contained 427 quotes on subjects such as the Communist Party, class struggle and socialism, youths, women and the arts.

It is estimated that more than five billion copies of the red book were printed, in more than 40 languages, making it the second most popular printed book after the bible. Marshall Lin Biao, who was Mao's right hand man, played a pivotal role in promoting the red book, and wrote the preface. After Lin Biao fell out of favour with Mao, many people had to cross out his name from the red book to show their allegiance.

There was a huge personality cult surrounding Mao Zedong. About two billion badges of Mao are estimated to have been produced during the Cultural Revolution. After 1969, production slowed - reportedly because Mao said the aluminium was needed for aeroplanes. The badges were most prevalent between 1966 and 1969, when everyone of “good character” wore one to show their loyalty to the “Great Leader”.

Many families in China kept objects from the Cultural Revolution as memorabilia. This badge belonged to a member of Yuwen's family.

Mao’s personality cult also went beyond the badges and the little red book. There were propaganda posters inside homes, classrooms, meeting halls, office buildings and factories. The line beneath Mao’s image says: Wishing Chairman Mao a long life.

This is an armband for the youth organisation generally known as the Red Guards. They were first set up in high schools and universities in Beijing in the summer of 1966 and soon spread across the whole country. The Red Guards regarded themselves as defenders of Chairman Mao - many beat those considered bourgeoisie or disloyal, including their teachers.

During the Cultural Revolution, universities and schools were run like semi-military institutions. Young people carried army water cans and military-style green bags when they marched to rallies and worked in the fields.

While Chairman Mao was revered, religious objects were defaced. The Red Guards attacked objects related to the "Four Olds": old thinking, old culture, old customs and old habits. Temples, tombs and heritage sites, and rare books and paintings, were destroyed. This statue of Buddha, in Ling Yin Temple in Hangzhou, China, is plastered with signs that read "destroy the old world" and "establish a new world." (courtesy: http://www.bbc.com/news/in-pictures-36274660)

അഗ്നിഹോത്റം ഹവിസ്

അഗ്നിഹോത്റം ഹവിസ് ഔഷധം

1. അമൃത്
2. ചിറ്റമൃത്
3. രാമച്ചം
4. ഏലക്ക
5. ജാതിക്ക
6. ഇരട്ടിമധുരം
7. നെല്ലിക ഉണങ്ങിയത്
8. ശതാവരി
9. ഗ്രാമ്പു
10. എള്ള്
11. ഉണക്കമുന്തിരി
12. കടുക്ക
13. താന്നിക്ക
14. കച്ചോലം
15. ചന്ദനം
16. അകി􀀀
17. വയമ്പ്
18. യെവം
19. പച്ചരി
20. ബ്രെഹ്മി
21. ചെറുപയ􀀀
22. ഉഴുന്ന്
23. കടുക്
24. കടല
25. പരിപ്പ്
26. മുതിര
27. കാരെള്ള്
28. കോപ്പ്ര
29. തുളസി ഇലയും പുവും
30. വേപ്പിലയും തൊലിയും
31. വഴനയിലയും തൊലിയും
32. കറുകപ്പുല്ല്
33. കുവളയില
34. കുറു കുറുംതോട്ടി
35. നീല കുറുംതോട്ടി സമുലം
36. ചെറുതേ􀀀
37. മുത്തങ്ങ
38. വെങ്കടുക്
39. മാതള തൊണ്ട്
40. മാവില മൊട്ടു
41. പ്ലാവില മൊട്ടു
42. ജാതിപത്രി
43. ശര്ക്കര
44. പച്ചകര്പ്പുരം
45. ജടമഞ്ഞി
46. നഗപ്പൂ
47. ഇഞ്ചിപ്പുല്ല്
48. മുക്കുറ്റി
49. കുടുകപ്പാലയരി
50. ക􀀀ക്കൊകിലയരി
51. നവധാനിയം
52. ജീരകം
53. ആര്യവ്വേപ്പി􀀀 തൊലി
54. ഇലഞ്ഞി തൊലി
55. ഗുല് ഗുലു
56. ചുക്ക്
57. താലിസ് പത്രം
58. തകരം
59. നറുനീണ്ടി
60. ദേവധാരു
61. കുംകുമപ്പൂ
62. നെയ്യ്

Real story of American Dollar v/s Indian Rupee

Dear Friends,

Kindly forward it to all Indian citizens and advice them to buy Indian products to save our nation. Our county leaders are not ready to save our nation. They are doing business for themselves and dollar countries. Politicians are encouraging foreign products because of their commission, they never worry about our nation. Please try to change our-self.

 Real story of American Dollar v/s Indian Rupee

An appeal to all who are worrying about fall of Indian Rupee

Throughout the country please stop using cars except for emergency. Definitely Dollar rate will come down. This is true. The value to dollar is given by petrol only. This is called Derivative Trading. America has stopped valuing its Dollar with Gold 70 years ago.

Americans understood that Petrol is equally valuable as Gold so they made Agreement with all the Middle East countries to sell petrol in Dollars only. That is why Americans print their Dollar as legal tender for debts. This mean if you don't like their American Dollar and go to their Governor and ask for repayment in form of Gold, as in India they won't give you Gold.

You observe Indian Rupee, " I promise to pay the bearer..." is clearly printed along with the signature of Reserve Bank Governor. This mean, if you don't like Indian Rupee and ask for repayment, Reserve Bank of India will pay you back an equal value of gold.(Actually there may be minor differences in the Transaction dealing rules, but for easy comprehension I am explaining this)

Let us see an example. Indian petroleum minister goes to Middle East country to purchase petrol, the Middle East petrol bunk people will say that liter petrol is one Dollar.  But Indians won't have dollars. They have Indian Rupees. So what to do now? So That Indian Minister will ask America to give Dollars. American Federal Reserve will take a white paper , print Dollars on it and give it to the Indian Minister. Like this we get dollars , pay it to petrol bunks and buy petrol.

But there is a fraud here. If you change your mind and want to give back the Dollars to America we can't demand them to pay Gold in return for the Dollars. They will say " Have we promised to return something back to you? Haven't you checked the Dollar ? We clearly printed on the Dollar that it is Debt"
So, Americans don't need any Gold with them to print Dollars. They will print Dollars on white papers as they like.

But what will Americans give to the Middle East countries for selling petrol in Dollars only?

Middle East kings pay rent to America for protecting their kings and heirs. Similarly they are still paying back the Debt to America for constructing Roads and Buildings in their countries. This is the value of American Dollar. That is why Many say some day the Dollar will be destroyed.

At present the problem of India is the result of buying those American Dollars. American white papers are equal to Indian Gold. So if we reduce the consumption of petrol and cars, Dollar will come down

And here is a small thing other than petrol , what we can do to our Indian Rupee

YOU CAN MAKE A HUGE DIFFERENCE TO THE INDIAN ECONOMY BY FOLLOWING FEW SIMPLE STEPS:-

Please spare a couple of minutes here for the sake of India.
Here's a small example:-

At 2008 August month 1 US $ = INR Rs 39.40
At 2013 August now 1 $ = INR Rs 62

Do you think US Economy is booming? No, but Indian Economy is Going Down.

Our economy is in your hands.INDIAN economy is in a crisis. Our country like many other ASIAN countries, is undergoing a severe economic crunch. Many INDIAN industries are closing down. The INDIAN economy is in a crisis and if we do not take proper steps to control those, we will be in a critical situation. More than 30,000 crore rupees of foreign exchange are being siphoned out of our country on products such as cosmetics, snacks, tea, beverages, etc. which are grown, produced and consumed here.

A cold drink that costs only 70 / 80 paise to produce, is sold for Rs.9 and a major chunk of profits from these are sent abroad. This is a serious drain on INDIAN economy. We have nothing against Multinational companies, but to protect our own interest we request everybody to use INDIAN products only at least for the next two years. With the rise in petrol prices, if we do not do this, the Rupee will devalue further and we will end up paying much more for the same products in the near future.

What you can do about it?
Buy only products manufactured by WHOLLY INDIAN COMPANIES.Each individual should become a leader for this awareness. This is the only way to save our country from severe economic crisis. You don't need to give-up your lifestyle. You just need to choose an alternate product.

Daily products which are COLD DRINKS,BATHING SOAP ,TOOTH PASTE,TOOTH BRUSH ,SHAVING CREAM,BLADE, TALCUM POWDER ,MILK POWDER ,SHAMPOO , Food Items etc. all you need to do is buy Indian Goods and Make sure Indian rupee is not crossing outside India.

Every INDIAN product you buy makes a big difference. It saves INDIA. Let us take a firm decision today.

We are not anti-multinational. we are trying to save our nation. every day is a struggle for a real freedom. we achieved our independence after losing many lives.
they died painfully to ensure that we live peacefully. the current trend is very threatening.

Multinationals call it globalization of indian economy. for indians like you and me, it is re-colonization of india. the colonist's left india then. but this time, they will make sure they don't make any mistakes.

Russia, S.Korea, Mexico - the list is very long!! let us learn from their experience and from our history. let us do the duty of every true Indian. finally, it's obvious that you can't give up all of the items mentioned below. so give up at least one item for the sake of our country!

Antiestablishmentarianism

Antiestablishmentarianism is a policy or attitude that views a nation's or society's power structure as corrupt, repressive, exploitative or unjust.

Antiestablishmentarians adhere to the doctrine of opposition to the social and political establishment. Their purpose is to subvert from within. This doctrine holds that establishments lose connection with the people and have their own agendas which frequently destroy the things they blindly don't address.

Antiestablishmentarianism has ties to anarchism but should not be confused with antifederalism or antifeudalism.

Modern day use

The modern use of the anti-establishment label became widespread in the 1960s.

The mindset this label describes prospered under the anxiety and frustration/anger with the United States government during the Vietnam war, as well as many other national governments during a similar time frame. Anxiety over the draft led to doubts concerning the implicit purpose of the war effort, and the moral legitimacy of that implicit purpose. The same attitude of doubt and independent moral scrutiny was, during this time period, applied to many established institutions of the day: race relations, gender relations, sexuality, cultural norms, musical creativity, drugs and drug prohibition, as well as various socio-economic concerns.

In this connotation, the phrase has at times been applied retroactively to historical phenomena that occurred before the 1960s; for example, the attitudes of both the German Nazi and Communist parties in the early 1930s; or the American radical movements of the late 19th and early 20th centuries.

Hungry Generation

In India the group of writers and painters during 1960s who called themselves Hungryalists are the most important contributors to antiestablishment literature.

Revolution

This talk of revolution is all humbug.  All this can be swept with the same broom into the trash can called "antiestablishmentarianism."  It applies also to religions who claim, "converting to my religion will save you and your family" or "converting to my religion is the only way out for you"..... because your religion is bad/wrong, does not show you the truth.

So you will notice that every antiestablishmentarian scaremonger tries to unleash fear in others, ask you to surrender and give in, by conveying through different nonviolent, not-so-violent, violent, and extremely violent modes, their underlying basic code, i.e. "you have to either comply or perish."

Living in exile in the safe, warm, and cosy comforts of democracy, renegades wrote their manual against democracy and named it communism.  The freedom of speech, of demonstration and protests displayed by coomies around the world are the ones most denied and crushed with a heavy fist under communist regimes.  Do you know anyone in any coomie paradise who did not comply and did not perish?

Humanity has a slow pace, no revolution is as stable and inclusive as evolution.  It is also true that humanity or for that matter animal world cannot exist without disparity.  Lions cannot agree to eat shrubs to establish equality and peace with antelopes.  Similarly, you cannot run a factory that is full of managers who give orders or full of workers who take orders to establish equality.  Phantasmagoric leftist intellectuals who dream of a world where manufacturing price = selling price to stop exploitation simply lack the prudence to exist among humans, forget discussing about economics.

Human thought will not agree to be forced to drive only through the Highway 1 to reach heaven.  The taste and comprehension of every human varies, and so, naturally, everyone agrees with a taste and logic that only he is comfortable with.  Every other imposed demand is unnatural, short-lived, and out-of-sync with the saga of human race.

The unheard and trampled voices of millions and millions of innocent humans crushed in attempts to hoist revolutions around the world simply does not permit civilized humans to sanction such revolutions.  The astonishing silence and coverup of the gruesome torture and killings of millions and millions of innocent men, women and children when revolutions have attempted to replace systems in nations across the world speaks in itself for the evil and failure of these revolutions which are argued to be ultimately for human good.



Revolutions are lead by frustrated renegades who ruin the lives of millions in order to showcase the lives of a few hundreds.  It has always been a failure, it is, and it will be...

The moot question now is the relevance of antiestablishmentarianism.  Inequalities and injustice has been part of human history, and to be prudent, shall be so ever, because we have now come to a point where we can distort any political or social turning point or incident from an inequality/injustice point of view.

Every political ideologue, who looks forward for a political life, knowingly or unknowingly, has been exposed to the practical aspects of antiestablishmentary movements.  The success of a political ideologue lies in his making a niche by finding his own antiestablishmentarian causes.

Quite naturally, antiestablishmentarian issues are not found freely lying by the road.  So what do we do?  Simple! Create one.

Making an issue out of a nonissue, rekindling instances in far forgotten and irrelevant history, distorting contemporary issues, and more dangerously stoking dissent - doing it all the while nestled in the comforts and safety of the establishment.

Antiestablishmentarianism can make even a mass murder like him a posterboy